| Date |
Filter |
Observer |
Depth [mmag] |
Length [hr] |
UT mid |
JD mid |
HJD mid |
HJD ephem |
dt [min] |
|
| 34 |
2008.05.06 |
V |
Roe |
7.1 ± 1.2' |
1.01 ± 0.12' |
06.144 ± 0.044' |
4592.7587 ± 0.0010 |
4592.7550 |
+5.2 ± 2.6 |
|
| 33 |
2008.04.30 |
R |
Mendez |
8.9 ± 1.0' |
0.98 ± 0.04' |
23.377 ± 0.019' |
4587.4771 ± 0.0010 |
4587.4675 |
+13.8 ± 1.1 |
|
| 32 |
2008.04.28 |
BB |
Gary |
7.6 ± 0.5' |
0.96 ± 0.05' |
07.873 ± 0.025' |
4584.8274 ± 0.0014 |
4584.8307 |
4584.8235 |
+11.4 ± 1.5 |
| 31 |
2008.04.23 |
R |
Naves |
8.2 ± 0.8' |
0.96 ± 0.09' |
00.880 ± 0.043' |
4579.5367 ± 0.0018 |
4579.5403 |
4579.5358 |
+6.6 ± 2.6 |
| 30 |
2008.04.15 |
R |
Rodriguez |
8.5 ± 1.0 |
0.94 ± 0.13 |
02.551 ± 0.066 |
4571.6063 ± 0.0027 |
4571.6105 |
4571.6042 |
+9.0 ± 3.9 |
| 29 |
2008.04.15 |
B |
Roe |
8.6 ± 0.7' |
1.22 ± 0.30' |
02.931 ± 0.152' |
4571.6221 ± 0.0063 |
4571.6263 |
4571.6042 |
+31.8 ± 9.1 |
| 28 |
20080401 |
R |
Mendez |
6.7 ± 1.1' |
1.00 ± 0.11' |
21.304 ± 0.057' |
4558.3877 ± 0.0024 |
4558.3925 |
4558.3850 |
+10.8 ± 3.4 |
|
27
|
2008.03.25
|
R
|
Naves
|
7.4 ± 0.8
|
0.74 ± 0.06
|
22.883 ± 0.032
|
4550.4535 ± 0.0013
|
4550.4585
|
4550.4534
|
+7.3 1.9
|
| 26 |
2008.03.22 |
I |
Gary |
8.9 ± 1.0 |
0.94 ± 0.07 |
07.444 ±
0.034 |
4547.8102 ±
0.0014 |
4547.8153 |
4547.8096 |
+8.3 ± 2.0 |
| 25 |
2008.03.18 |
R |
Naves |
6.0 ± 0.8 |
1.08 ± 0.07 |
00.519 ±
0.035 |
4542.5216 ±
0.0014 |
4542.5269 |
4542.5219 |
+7.2 ± 2.1 |
| 24 |
2008.03.06 |
V |
Schwartz |
7.1 ± 0.7 |
0.80 ± 0.08 |
10.705 ±
0.041 |
4531.9461 ±
0.0018 |
4531.9513 |
4531.9465 |
+7.0 ± 2.4 |
| 23 |
2008.03.01 |
V |
Gregorio |
6.1 ± 0.8 |
1.19 ± 0.14 |
03.799 ±
0.071 |
4526.6583 ±
0.0030 |
4526.6635 |
4526.6588 |
+6.9 ± 4.2 |
| 22 |
2008.03.01 |
I |
Roe |
8.8 ± 0.9
|
0.80 ± 0.04 |
03.854 ±
0.020 |
4526.6608 ±
0.0008 |
4526.6660 |
4526.6588 |
+10.2 ±
1.2 |
| 21 |
2008.03.01 |
C |
Muler |
8.1 ± 1.1 |
0.94 ± 0.13 |
03.874 ±
0.064 |
4526.6610 ±
0.0027 |
4526.6663 |
4526.6588 |
+10.8 ±
3.8 |
| 20 |
2008.03.01 |
I |
Naves |
8.4 ± 1.7 |
1.16 ± 0.18 |
03.884 ±
0.091 |
4526.6618 ±
0.0038 |
4526.6671 |
4526.6588 |
+12.0 ±
5.4 |
| 19 |
2008.03.01 |
V |
Gary |
10.8 ± 2.3 |
0.90 ± 0.14 |
03.754 ±
0.070 |
4526.6564 ± 0.0030 | 4526.6617 |
4526.6588 |
4.2 ± 4.2 |
| 18 |
2008.02.24 |
R |
Srdoc |
8.5 ± 1.5 |
1.30 ± 0.10 |
21000 ±
0.071 |
4521.3750 ±
0.0030 |
4521.3802 |
4521.3711 |
+13.2 ±
4.2 |
| 17 |
2008.02.22 |
R |
Gary |
7.8 ± 1.9 |
0.81 ± 0.11 |
05.534 ±
0.057 |
4518.7306 ±
0.0024 |
4518.7357 |
4518.7272 |
+12.3 ±
3.4 |
| 16 |
2008.02.16 |
V |
Dufoer |
7.3 ± 1.0 |
0.94 ± 0.09 |
22.510 ±
0.061 |
4513.4379 ±
0.0025 |
4513.4430 |
4513.4395 |
+5.0 ± 3.6 |
| 15 |
2008.02.16 |
R |
Marchini et al | 8.6 ± 1.4 |
1.20 ± 0.15 |
22.537 ±
0.076 |
4513.4390 ±
0.0033 |
4513.4441 |
4513.4395 |
+6.6 ± 4.6 |
| 14 |
2008.02.16 |
R |
Vanmunster |
7.5 ± 1.0 |
0.83 ± 0.09 |
22.535 ±
0.044 |
4513.4390 ±
0.0018 |
4513.4440 |
4513.4395 |
+6.5 ± 2.7 |
| 13 |
2008.02.16 |
R |
Srdoc |
6.6 ± 1.0 | 0.97 ± 0.09 | 22.415 ± 0.044 | 4513.4340 ± 0.0018 | 4513.4390 |
4513.4395 |
-0.7 ± 2.7 |
| 12 |
2008.02.14 |
V |
Schwartz |
8.1 ± 0.9 |
0.91 ± 0.10 |
07.129 ±
0.050 |
4510.7970 ±
0.0021 |
4510.8020 |
4510.7957 |
+9.1 ± 3.0 |
| 11 |
2008.02.14 |
V |
Walter |
10.7 ± 1.0 |
0.97 ± 0.09 |
07.152 ±
0.046 |
4510.7980 ±
0.0019 |
4510.8029 |
4510.7957 |
+10.5 ±
2.8 |
| 10 |
2008.02.09 |
R |
Mendez |
8.8 ± 1.0 |
1.08 ± 0.10 |
00.260 ±
0.052 |
4505.5108 ±
0.0022 |
4505.5156 |
4505.5080 |
+11.0 ±
3.1 |
| 9 |
2008.02.09 |
R |
Marchini et al |
10.0 ± 1.5 |
1.45 ± 0.13 |
00.225 ±
0.067 |
4505.5094 ±
0.0028 |
4505.5142 |
4505.5080 |
+8.9 ± 4.0 |
| 8 |
2008.02.09 |
R |
Gregorio |
8 ± 3 |
n/a |
00.290 ±
0.083 |
4505.5121 ±
0.0035 |
4505.5169 |
4505.5080 |
+12.8 ±
5.0 |
| 7 |
2008.02.09 |
C |
Staels |
7.5 ± 1.0 | 0.87 ± 0.07 | 00.235 ± 0.037 | 4505.5098 ± 0.0015 | 4505.5146 |
4505.5080 |
+9.5 ± 2.2 |
| 6 |
2008.02.06 |
R |
Gary |
5.4 ± 1.0 |
0.99 ± 0.07 |
08.785 ±
0.035 |
4502.8660 ±
0.0015 |
4502.8707 |
4502.8641 |
+9.5 ± 2.1 |
| 5 |
2008.02.01 |
R |
Naves |
6.5 ± 1.0 | 0.92 ± 0.12 | 01.790 ± 0.060 | 4497.5746 ± 0.0025 | 4497.5790 |
4497.5764 |
+3.8 ± 3.6 |
| 4 |
2008.01.24 |
R |
Srdoc |
11.5 ± 1.0 |
0.75 ± 0.07 |
03.655 ±
0.036 |
4489.6523 ±
0.0015 |
4489.6563 |
4489.9449 |
+16.5 ±
2.1 |
| 3 |
2007.12.31 |
BB |
Gary |
8.0 ± 1.5 | 0.80 ± 0.09 | 08.355 ± 0.048 | 4465.8479 ± 0.0020 | 4465.8498 |
4465.8502 |
-0.3 ± 2.6 |
| 2 |
2007.05.31 |
R |
Gary |
8.5 ± 1.0 | 0.95 ± 0.07 | 04.775 |
4251.6990 |
4251.6993 |
4251.6984 |
+1.7 |
| 1 |
2007.05.17 |
V |
Vanmunster |
8.4 ± 1.0 | 0.90 ± 0.05 | 23.46 |
4238.4775 |
4238.47926 |
4238.47910 |
+0.2 |
Frequent uses of a hair dryer to remove frost from the
corrector plate; temp = 28 F, Dew Pt = 22 F (RH = 78%). WWV check
of time tags.
The clock was checked & found to be accurate.
Air mass curvature is high due to use of a BB-filter
and high air mass at the beginning.
These observations were a test of a new optical configuration which
accounts for the short duration. Nevertheless, there seems to be mild
evidence for 1 mmag variations on an hourly timescale.
Professional Transit
Light Curves
Gillon et al (2007) SST observations at
8 micron wavelength, reproduced from Ribas et al (2008). Lowest panel
shoes effect of a hypothetical 0.1 degree inclination change that
could be produced by perturbations from a 5-Earth mass outer
orbit planet in a 2:1 resonant orbit.
V-band, Observatory of Geneva 1.2-meter
Euler telescope at La Silla Observatory, Chile (Gillon
et al, 2007). Mid-transit at 2007
May 02, 02:41 UT. My measurements of this LC yield depth ~6.5 ±
1.0 mag, length = 0.943 ± 0.064 hr.
Figure F1. Finder image with identifier star
numbers (above) and J-K colors (times 100, below) selected stars.
GJ 436 has V = 10.68 and Rc = 9.66.
.
Normally I don't present all-sky photometry results without completing
a second observing session and analysis and verify compatibility
between the two results. In this case I have no plans for doing this
since I doubt that anyone will use any of these results.
Figure A2 and A3. Color/color scatter diagram showing the location
of GJ 436 (red square) and the 9 nearby stars (gray squares) in relation
to 1259 landolt stars.
If the solution for one filter band had a systematic error it would show
up in these plots as a group offset in the color/color scatter diagrams
involving that filter. For example, if all B-magnitudes were high
by 0.05 magnitude then the goup of gray squares and the red square would
be offset to the right by 0.05 magnitude. It's possible that such an
offset is present in Fig. A2, but it's clear that greater vaues fo such
an offset are very unlikely. An alternative for explaining the rightward
shift of Fig. A2 gray squares is for there to be instead a downward shift,
or values for V that are to negative by about the same 0.05 magnitude
amount. This is unlikely after inspecting Fig. A3, where there is no evidence
of shifts. Presumably, all 3 bands (V, R and I) are free of calibration
error offsets (unless by some unlikely circumstance there are offset errors
in all 3 bands that excatly compensate to produce color/color agreement
with the Landolot stars). If it is true that V, R and I are free of calibration
offset errors greater than ~0.03 magnitude, then what should be make
of the funny location for GJ 436 in Fig. A3? I claim that it is inescapable
that GJ 436 has a much greater V-I color than the Landolt stars. Since
V appears to be normal (e.g., Fig. A2), we must conclude that I is anomalous.
In other words, these color/color scatter diagrams show that GJ 436
has an I-magnitude that is brighter than normal by ~0.5 magnitude!
I'll leave it to others to explain how this could be the case.
Note: It won't matter what magnitude you assume for reference stars for
the purpose of obtaining quality light curves. These estimated values
are presented for the purpose of identifying star colors that "match"
GJ 436's color which can be useful in minimizing extinction related
systematic errors (i.e, LC curvature that's correlated with air mass).
In this table the column for R-band will be the most accurate since it
is based on observations. The other magnitudes for Stars 1 through 6
are based on JK magnitudes. For GJ 436 the B and I magnitudes are based
on color/color correlations for main sequence stars. All stars in the
table are compatible with main sequence color/color relationships.
Gillon et al, 2007, Astron, & Astrophys., "Detection of Transits
of the Nearby Hot Neptune GJ 436" http://babbage.sissa.it/abs/0705.2219
Butler et al, 2004, Astrophys. J. Lett.,"A Neptune-Mass
Planet Orbiting the Nearby M Dwarf GJ 436" http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...617..580B
Ribas et al, 2008, Astrophys. J. Lett., "A ~5_earth
Super Earth Orbiting GJ 436?: The Poser of Near-Grazing Transits"
http://fr.arxiv.org/abs/0801.3230
Return to calling web page AXA
WebMaster: Bruce
L. Gary. Nothing on this web page is copyrighted. This site opened:
July 04, 2007. Last Update: May 09,
2008 (UT)