HD 17156
AXA Light Curves & Finder Charts & All-Sky Photometry Results

Links internal to this web page:
    Comments
    Basic data
    Table of AXA (amateur) transit measurements
    Table of professional transit measurements
    Transit LCs
    OOT LCs
    Finder images

  
References

Basic Data

    RA = 02:49:44.6, Decl = +71:45:11
    Season = Nov 09
    B = 08.76
, V = 08.17, R = 7.78, I = 7.57, J = 7.08, K = 6.76, B-V = 0.59 (Barbieri, 2007)
    HJDo = 4459.69987 (45)  &  P = 21.21688 (44) day (as listed in Schneider's Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia)
    HJDo = 4459.69954 (60)  &  P = 21.2163717 (19) day (AXA fit, see below); or better yet: HJDo = 4671.86325 (45)  &  P = 21.2163717 (19) day
    Depth = 6.5 ± 1.0 mmag (C,V,R-bands)
    Length = 3.08
± 0.10 hr
    Fp = 0.18
± 0.05, F2 = 0.78 ± 0.10

Comments

This is a difficult object to observe because the depth is small (< 7 mmag) and the period is long and uncertain (21.2 days). At least it's bright. So far it appears that the period should be shortened to 21.21652 days. Tonny Vanmunster has an intriguing OOT light curve that shows a transit when none were expected (2008.05.11). Keep this object high on your observing list.

Short et al (2008) published (http://fr.arxiv.org/abs/0803.2935) a possible detection of a "second planet" (HD 17156c) in an outer orbit that perturbs the transiting plant's (planet "b") transit times by significant amounts. Every 333 days the mid-transit times should "jump" about 3 minutes. This should be observable using amateur telescopes provided several transits are observed after the jump (or more than one observer measures the same transit after a jump). Recent measurements of mid-transit times are incompatible with the predicted "second planet" transit timing variation (TTV) and a slightly shorter period is compatible with measured TTV. (Thanks, Peter McCullough, for pointing out that the present TTV is inconsistent with the Short et al "second planet" TTV.)

More recently, Jose Fernandez used the TransitSearch Systemics program to "solve for" the presence of exoplanet "d" in this solar system. This hypothesized exoplanet is supposed to have a mass of 0.02 times Jupiter, is in an innser orbit with a 1.23-day period, and could produce a transit with depth of 1.6 mmag. There's more info on it at http://brucegary.net/AXA/TransitSearch/TransitSearchLC.htm#6

My position is that radial velocity measurements must have systematic errors that haven't been accounted for and there is no evidence for any more planets in this system.

Table of Amateur Observations

       

               

               

             
    

         
Comparison of observed mid-transit times with prediction (green) by Short et al (2008) that involves another planet perturbing HD 17156b and the superior fit of the simple period adjustment (dashed blue). 

The conclusion from the above plot is that a simple period adjustment is required for HD 17156b and the case for a "second planet" to account for radial velocity measurements is diminished. 


Table of professional observations



Light Curves


9A12GJ2


9719NR2


9719SG2  


8c19GJ21


8b07FC21


8b07GBL1  Note the 8-sec exposures needed to avoid saturation. A total of 2606 images were mae during this 11-hour observing session.


 
8a17GBL2


8925GJ21


7c25GBL1


A first submission; couldn't have chosen a more difficult exoplanet transit to observe. Good RMS per unit time; RMS(2-min) = 1.5 mmag.

Out-of-Transit (OOT) Light Curves


9926SD21


9923SG21 Defocused.


9823SG21



This exoplanet system is interesting enough that observing at any time is potentially useful.



This transit feature should not have been observed! Don't know why Tonny observed HD 17156 on this date, but it sure looks like he found something unexpected.


Here's a way to interpret the same data assuming there was no transit feature.

Last May I posted the following LC plot on this page. It has the correct mid-transit UT date but the HJD noted inthe plot is off by one day. Instead of  4597.3927 it should be 4598.3927 (or, using a more accurate length assumption, something closer to 4598.3934 (as noted two LC plots above)

Tonny used an erroneous ephemeris to decide on observing HD 17156 on this date. The preceding transit date for "b" is 2008 04 30.50 and the following transit date for "b" is 2008 05 21.71. This transit feature occurs 11 days after a "b" transit and 10 days before the next "b" transit. Hmmm! What's going on here? Maybe we should be observing this object at random times! (I repeat the above caution: the plot has a 1day error in stated HJD for mid-transit; it should read 4598.3937).

Finder Charts



References

Discovery paper: Barbieri, M., 2007 hd17156b.pdf
Irwin et al, 2008 http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.1496
Winn et al, 2008 http://fr.arxiv.org/abs/0810.4725


Return to calling web page AXA

____________________________________________________________________

WebMaster: Bruce L. GaryNothing on this web page is copyrighted. This site opened:  October 04, 2007 Last Update:  2009.11.30